#gear

Articles tagged: gear

8 articles

Running with music in earbuds: running feels easier but breathing gets worse β€” a randomised trial in 32 runners

Running with music in earbuds: running feels easier but breathing gets worse β€” a randomised trial in 32 runners

Loud music in earbuds made a 20-minute run feel easier β€” and at the same time pushed breathing towards rapid and shallow, increased vertical oscillation by 30% and raised energy expenditure by 1.1%. We look at an Italian study from October 2026, what it means for easy runs and races, and why it is no reason to throw away your playlist.

Olga Marchenkoβ€’
Read more β†’
Garmin bought Moxy: what a muscle oxygen sensor really measures β€” up to Β±20 points between legs and a threshold that repeats to within 7 watts

Garmin bought Moxy: what a muscle oxygen sensor really measures β€” up to Β±20 points between legs and a threshold that repeats to within 7 watts

Without a press release, Garmin bought Moxy β€” the longest-standing maker of muscle oxygen saturation (SmOβ‚‚) sensors β€” and back in February filed an application for the Muscle Battery trademark. We explain what SmOβ‚‚ shows, why the absolute number is noisy by 14–18 points, and how the threshold from the trend reproduces from test to test within a few watts.

Ekaterina Gromovaβ€’
Read more β†’
Heart rate in your earbuds: AirPods Pro 3 vs a chest strap β€” a 2-beat average error and Β±10 at high intensity

Heart rate in your earbuds: AirPods Pro 3 vs a chest strap β€” a 2-beat average error and Β±10 at high intensity

Irish researchers compared the heart rate sensor in AirPods Pro 3 with a Polar H10 chest strap in 40 participants and 16 735 paired readings. The average error was about 2 beats with no systematic bias, but at high intensity individual readings drift by Β±10. We look at which workouts the earbuds are good enough for.

Maxim Belyaevβ€’
Read more β†’
Your watch lies by kilometres: eight GPS models, a 3.2–6.1% error, and why the forest is β€œshorter” and the track is β€œlonger”

Your watch lies by kilometres: eight GPS models, a 3.2–6.1% error, and why the forest is β€œshorter” and the track is β€œlonger”

The same long run: you have 32 km, your partner has 29. A look at validation studies of sport watches: up to 9% under-reading in the city and the forest, systematic over-reading on the track, a 12.1% error for the worst model over 4,000 m, and where the extra three kilometres come from when there are no satellites.

Ekaterina Gromovaβ€’
Read more β†’